Here’s one side effect I never expected after cancer treatments: curly hair.


I shouldn’t have been that surprised: Hair growing back curly after chemo is a fairly common experience. My friend Laura Ben-David, who died in 2025 after a long battle with ovarian cancer, sported some lovely curls in her final days.

My new curls highlight a long history with hair, both my personal story and how changing hairstyles often mirror cultural developments in society at large.

Sociologist Rose Weitz writes in her book Rapunzel’s Daughters, “Hair is one of the first ways we learn to tell the story of who we are.” UCLA historian Robin D.G. Kelley concurs. “Style is never superficial. It is how people make history visible on their bodies.”

My tale begins in elementary school, although I didn’t have much follicular autonomy back then: My parents kept my hair short and respectably suburban.

Entering junior high at the beginning of the 1970s, though, marked a turning point. I began sporting a quasi-Beatles cut with thick bangs (even if I was ten years too late to culturally appropriate true Beatlemania).

The main thing was my hair had to cover my ears. I wanted to appear like the hippies who populated nearby Haight-Ashbury in San Francisco, even though I had no idea what a hippie actually was at the time.

At that age, unfortunately, I didn’t look particularly masculine. That led to a traumatic experience where a math teacher, substituting for my beloved Mrs. York, called on “the young lady in the back row.”

Yup, that was me.

The class erupted in laughter, and I became known for several years as “Briana.” (Any former middle school friends reading this: If you were part of that crew, an apology would be more than welcome.)

By high school, my hair still covered my ears, but now that I had more masculine features, I was ready for some facial hair. I wanted to mimic the looks of my favorite progressive rock stars, all of whom (other than Freddie Mercury of Queen) were properly bearded. However, my tenth-grade attempt to grow a mustache prompted my English teacher, Mrs. Andreski, to suggest I might want to consider using a black felt-tip pen to fill in the gaps.

Then, there was the summer when I tried to emulate the cool kids who parted their hair down the middle. I had my bangs cut specifically for that look, which would have worked out fine if not for Jeff Miller, reveling in his role as tormentor, who mocked me relentlessly until I sheepishly returned to the familiar side part before the school year started.

By college, I was finally able to grow a full beard and mustache, which I kept for the next twenty years. For two of the three years I attended Oberlin, I went entirely without a trim. When I posed with my friend Jane Segadelli next to a poster calling on support for the Sandinistas (as with the hippies, I had no idea what a Sandinista stood for), I looked every bit the Central American Marxist wannabe I wasn’t.


In the spring of my senior year, I came up with an experiment: I would cut it all – hair, beard, mustache – then show up to class, expecting that no one would know who I was!

Unfortunately, the weather took an unexpected wintry turn, and I had no choice but to come to campus in my highly identifiable orange down jacket.

Cover blown.

My hair grew progressively shorter as I gained in years. By the 1990s, then married and living in Israel, the clean-shaven look, bald-if-you-dared was all the fashion. I wasn’t ready to go entirely hairless, but let’s just say I never needed to run a comb through my hair.

When Covid hit in 2020, I stopped going to Dave, the only hairdresser I’d seen since we made aliyah 26 years earlier, and Jody became my in-house barber. She liked my hair longer. Cutting my hair in the living room meant I could get more frequent trims without needing to shell out a hundred shekels a pop.

Two years earlier, when I was diagnosed with cancer, to acknowledge this unwanted status, I defiantly grew my beard back, although it was more like George Clooney’s five o’clock shadow than a revolutionary pose.

Last year marked perhaps the final turning point. My hair style this time wasn’t tied to a particular decade or fashion. R-CHOP, a particular chemotherapy I’d hoped to avoid, became inevitable. I lost most of the hair on my head, as well as my arms, legs and pits. (Kept my eyebrows, fortunately.)

A few months after the CAR-T treatment I received a year ago that saved my life, my hair began to return as well. Jody noticed it first: thick curls on the left side of my head in the back. The curls spread – first upwards, then to the right side.

Jody loved it. Me? I’d spent 65 years with straight hair. What did I know from curls?

But as much as Jody loved running her fingers through my thick mane of flips and waves, it began to get unruly. Jody attempted a trim that would return some sense of order, but as she hacked away, the curls were inevitably sacrificed. The haircut looks great and the curls will, I’m sure, eventually grow back.


When they do, and assuming we can find a style that somehow maximizes both propriety and wild abandon, I will wear it with pleasure as a sign of my body’s resilience and the strange way it has of showing that off, both at the present moment and in the many hairstyles that have defined me through decades of personal and societal change.

I first wrote about my curls for The Jerusalem Post.

{ 0 comments }

I hate packing. Vacation is great, but before you leave, you have to spend so much time picking out the right clothing combinations that will fit your specific needs. That’s especially complicated when the weather can be blazingly hot during the day and bitterly cold at night.


Then there’s the travel medication. In addition to any regular meds, you need to anticipate every inevitability: pills for pain, creams for stiff necks and dry toes; sleeping capsules, antibiotics (always be prepared!), meds in case of nausea, opioids if everything goes totally sideways.

Now, try packing all of that when you don’t know if war is going to start up again while you’re abroad and your flight home could be canceled.

Prudence dictates you should double or triple up everything. That, at least, was our experience overpacking for what should have been a quick jaunt to Cyprus for a four-night stay at the Secret Forest, the popular Israeli-run kosher resort.

My wife, Jody, and I started planning the trip in January. But when the U.S. and Israel attacked Iran and the regime responded in kind, we didn’t feel comfortable finishing our booking not knowing if we’d still be at war. People were hoofing it to Taba or Amman or Sharm el-Sheikh to make their international flights.

When it looked like the ceasefire seemed to be holding, we got back in touch with the resort. They were just two seats left on the El Al flight to Paphos (the Secret Forest takes care of accommodations, board and flights for one price), so we had to act fast. Not succumbing to our typical days-long debate, we let whim guide our decision and grabbed those spots.

The very next day, the headlines blared, “U.S. preparing to restart war in coming days.”

Oy, what had we done?

But this was to be my first trip overseas since my CAR-T cancer treatment, and I didn’t want to miss out.

We also desperately needed a break from the frequent trips to the bomb shelter, the constant checking of the “Can I Shower Now?” app or waiting for the scritch-scratch alarm on our phones indicating that a siren would likely sound shortly.

When no missiles had landed on Israel by the morning of our trip, we headed to Ben-Gurion airport and hoped for the best.

Part of the allure of Cyprus is it’s so close to Israel. But when you factor in transport time to Yitzkak Navon station in Jerusalem, then the train to the airport, check-in, security, passport control and grabbing a bite to eat (since short flights don’t serve food), followed by picking up your luggage and boarding the bus for the 40-minute ride into the mountains, it’s actually close to the same as the drive to Eilat.

The Eilat comparison proved apt. The Secret Forest makes for a bizarre combination – a cross-section of Israel transported into the Cypriot mountains.

The resort is 100% Hebrew speaking. All of the lectures, guided meditations, yoga and Pilates instructors, the evening entertainment, the experiential “reversing” seminar and, of course, all 200 guests were Israeli. The kosher food (dairy and pescatarian) attracts a significant percentage of observant guests.

With Hebrew the linga franca, there was no feeling we were getting a taste of another country’s culture. Other than the waiters in the restaurant or the shuttle drivers, we could have been in Hadera or Holon (where half the guests seemed to be from).

If there’s a Cypriot favorite food, it wasn’t offered at the expansive farm-to-table brunch buffets. But there were two kinds of shashuka and a plentiful supply of smoked fish and fresh breads, mainstays at any respectable Israeli hotel spread.

The views eerily resembled the hills of the Upper Galilee; utterly familiar, still beautiful.

My point is: If one is looking for an escape from the Israeli pressure cooker, the Secret Forest aint it.


That doesn’t mean it’s not worth going. The grounds are gorgeous – the place was an established retreat before Yoni Kahane, an Israeli tourism entrepreneur and Chabadnik who owns and manages other kosher properties in Cyprus and beyond, acquired it in 2023. His vision was to refashion the Secret Forest as a comprehensive, adults-only wellness retreat.

The staff encourages guests to tuck their phones in their suite safes or at least not to follow the news back home too closely.

There are no chocolate treats waiting on your bedroom pillow; rather, each room has a full supply of nuts and fruits. Throughout the resort, wine and cocktails are free (no soft drinks allowed). Before brunch, which starts at 10:00 am, unlimited strawberry and mango smoothies are available. The honey in the dining hall buffet was so fresh, it was still attached to the comb.

Rinat, who performed two of the four nights we were there, was less an Eastern Mediterranean troubadour than a classic Israeli erev shira (Hebrew for sing-along) cheerleader. The one night when there was a local Greek band, they davka had learned a few Hebrew hits to throw into the mix.

Much dancing and merriment ensued.

The highlight of our time was a hike to the neighboring village of Miliou. The foliage-friendly dirt path parallels a brook that babbles absently. I was surprised by how out of breath I was during the at times steep climb (I’m still working on accepting my post-cancer “new normal”), but I did it, which made both Jody and me feel proud.

As our time in Cyprus drew to a close, we began the seven-hour return home. Upon landing at Ben-Gurion, nothing seemed to have changed.

“As Iran talks stall, Israel and U.S. prepping to renew war as soon as next week,” one headline announced.

I unpacked all the extra clothes and medications we’d stuffed into our already overweight suitcase, all the while wondering if this, too, has become a new normal.

I first wrote about packing during wartime for The Jerusalem Post.

{ 0 comments }

One year since I nearly died

by Brian on May 15, 2026

in Cancer,Health,Science

Here’s something your doctor will probably never ask you: “Do you want this potentially life-saving treatment? Or would you rather die?”

But what if the question were phrased differently?

“There’s a 30% chance the medicine won’t do anything to keep you alive. Moreover, if it does help, when you come out the other side, you won’t be the same person you are now. But we can’t actually tell you what your quality of life will be. Every person is unique.”

What might have seemed a clear-cut choice now seems muddier, right?

This week marks the one-year anniversary of my decision to opt for what was behind Door Number One – the life-saving treatment – and yet these questions still loom large.

The treatment in question, CAR-T, which transforms your own T-cells into cancer-chomping Pac-men, worked for me. In two weeks, it had knocked out the lymphoma from which I’d suffered for some seven years.

That said, I am definitely not the same person I was before.

A few months before my cancer transformed into aggressive DLBCL, my wife, Jody, and I had been hiking the hills of Lisbon and Porto. By the end of that year, I had lost a kidney, was deep into the one type of chemo I’d desperately hoped to avoid, and had lost my hair, my stamina and my appetite.

I was six weeks in the hospital getting my CAR-T, during which time I was barely able to get out of bed without help; just taking the daily recommended stroll around the ward was an exercise in embarrassment.

Eventually, I was released, cured for now, but incredibly weak, with my bladder lining so decimated from all the drugs and radiation that every pee felt like a sushi chef’s jujitsu knife at play.

This was not the body I knew.

But slowly – very slowly – I started to get stronger. I returned to my exercise routine and added back yoga. I was able to put aside the cane and could get up the stairs without clinging to the banister.

I was feeling so positive, I planned a cruise for our entire family. The logic was, if I was especially tired one day, I could just hang back and enjoy the endless buffet and heated pools while the rest of our party went out and explored the local scenery.

Then, without warning, my blood counts crashed.

My platelets, which normally should be at a minimum of 150,000, hovered around a paltry 20,000. My neutrophils were in the toilet, as was my hemoglobin. My doctor reassured me this is not unexpected after CAR-T, but it was another unanticipated gut punch.

I wound up needing to take three different injections a week just to keep my levels at a bare minimum. I became a regular pincushion at the nearby blood lab. Every month, I haul myself to Hadassah for IV infusions to boost my IgG levels. I take 15 pills a day.

My son, Amir, commented that the entire process had aged me by 10 years. I might be 65 chronologically, but I feel and act more like 75. Nor has it been gradual aging. I went from 65 to 75 seemingly overnight.

All of which makes me wonder, if I were to require more treatment – if the cancer were to come back or something new cropped up – would the question my doctor never asked a year ago become relevant this time? 

I think about bioethicist and author of Eat Your Ice Cream: Six Simple Rules for a Long and Healthy Life Dr. Ezekiel Emmanuel’s famous assertion that, at age 75, he wouldn’t do anything to prolong his existence. No chemo, no colonoscopies, no cardiac stress tests.

Had I reached that point – just 10 years earlier than expected?

And yet, my mind remains clear. I am able to pontificate as lucidly as before, whether in my writing or at the Shabbat table. I’m learning new things, like how best to employ AI. While I do forget a few things here and there, that probably is age-related!

In the first months after I was released from the hospital, I’d regularly ask Jody, “Why didn’t you advise me to say no to the treatment? You knew I wouldn’t be the same.”

It’s a good thing she didn’t. “I want to live,” I now say with a faint smile.

My hematologist tells me that every time I’m at Hadassah for a checkup, she tells her team, “Here comes my walking miracle.”

Optimism has, for the moment, won out. Perhaps that’s why I just put a deposit down on another trip – a 20-day excursion to Vietnam and Cambodia for Jody and me.

It’s not for another year – early 2027 – by which time I hope I will have regained enough of my strength that we can explore the streets and waterways of Hanoi and Hoi An and Ha Long Bay. (I made sure we can always cancel and get our money back.)

I’ve even started to keep a gratitude journal. Every night, I write down one good thing that happened that day. Playing with the grandkids. A satisfying meal. A compelling TV show.

Psychologist and Atlantic contributor Arthur Brooks has a different approach: He keeps a log of his regrets and disappointments.

Whenever he writes something down, he leaves two lines blank underneath. Then he makes a note to look at it in a month, and again in a month after that. The original complaint – the feelings, thoughts and emotions around it – invariably seem smaller, he claims.

Science has a name for this: the Fading Affect Bias. While roughly 60% of unpleasant experiences lose their emotional sting over time, only 42% of the pleasant ones fade. This creates a gap of nearly 20% — an inclination towards positivity that edits the narrative of our lives.

That works for me. In the meantime, who wants to meet next year at Angkor Wat?

This article first appeared in The Jerusalem Post.

{ 0 comments }

Dripping acid

by Brian on May 10, 2026

in Cancer,Health,Science,Technology

I have always tried to be honest about my health. Still, it’s difficult to share about one particular malady that’s been vexing me these past months.

One of the treatments I had in the last year – most likely the chemo I received prior to the CAR-T that knocked out my cancer – did a real number on my bladder.

The toxins in the chemo apparently damaged my “GAG layer.” That’s the protective boundary that keeps the acidic urine from irritating the bladder wall itself. (To amuse myself with this new terminology, I will sing the “gag me with a spoon” line from Moon Zappa’s 1982 epic, “Valley Girl.”)

When I went to my urologist to complain about the constant burning and urgency “down there,” he ordered the bladder operation I wrote about in a previous column.

The pathology showed no cancer, but it did point to severe inflammation of the GAG layer. And by severe, I mean the pain has become unbearable. It’s a Catch-22 situation. The better hydrated I am, the less concentrated the urine and the less pain it causes. But the more I drink, the more the urgency dominates.

“Most people just live with it,” my urologist told me, in that blunt Israeli way.

“I’m not most people,” I shot back.

We first tried a low-dose course of steroids – the same prednisone I had left over that may have saved young Ethan’s life during the High Holidays.

Steroids were not my urologist’s first choice – he didn’t even know the dosage to give me or for how long. I asked my “shadow doctor”: AI. When ChatGPT supplied what seemed like a non-hallucinatory answer, he readily agreed.

The pills, unfortunately, didn’t work. Worse, it resulted in “rebound” pain more intense than when it all started. That left us with Plan B: hyaluronic acid (HA) instillations directly into the bladder.

HA is a molecule found in the body that helps hydrate skin, lubricates joints and cushions tissue. Since it’s very effective at holding water, HA is commonly used in eye drops, fillers for wrinkles and as an aid for healing wounds and tissue regeneration.

HA is naturally present in the GAG layer, so adding extra HA can fill in any missing patches to shield the underlying tissue from irritants and bacteria. Exactly what I needed.

Sadly, there’s only one way in. I was so hoping the steroids would work, but given that my symptoms were making it difficult to be more than ten seconds from a bathroom – not helpful if you’re playing in a typically toilet-less Israeli park with your grandkids or stuck in your seat during an airplane’s final approach – I decided to instill the bullet, so to speak.

It was to be the ultimate acid test (minus the Ken Kesey psychedelic antics).

HA installations are quick but must be repeated every week for eight sessions – that is, a full two months – and you don’t usually feel relief until about three-quarters of the way through.

Something to look forward to every Monday morning.

I’ll skip to the good news first: The instillations weren’t as bad as I’d imagined. Tal, my initial HA nurse, grew up partly in Chicago, so he was able to explain what he was doing in fluent English, which already put me more at ease. Of the three nurses I worked with over the course of the treatment period, only one spoke no English.

The nurses use a “baby catheter” – the thinnest one available – and lots of numbing lidocaine gel. Getting the lidocaine in there was actually the most painful part. Once the local anesthesia kicked in, I barely felt the baby catheter.

Next comes the HA itself. As the fluid filled me up, I felt a not inconsiderable amount of pressure, like I had to pee right then and there (which of course I couldn’t with a one-way catheter blocking any exit).

The whole process, thankfully, takes less than three minutes.

When the instillation is done, the catheter comes out and the hardest part begins: You’re not allowed to use the bathroom for at least an hour. Of course, that’s all I wanted to do. I hobbled around the hospital corridors and eventually shoehorned myself into the car to drive home.

Would I have preferred to be knocked out by general anesthesia so I wouldn’t feel a thing? Sure, but total body sedation for such a short procedure would have been both overkill and cumulatively dangerous.

HA is not covered by Maccabi, our local HMO, so you have to buy it from the manufacturer; if you have private insurance, which thankfully we do, you’ll get reimbursed.

However, my doctor recalled that I had done several rounds of radiation to reduce my tumors in the past. Is that what caused my GAG layer damage? Hard to say, but Maccabi’s regulations say if the inflammation may have been due to radiation, the hyaluronic acid is free.

The only thing worse than the HA instillation itself is the weekly anticipation. I’d rather be looking forward to a nice hike or one of the brisket sandwiches from Bruno (the best sandwich shop in Jerusalem). Moreover, I sleep poorly as a general rule; knowing you’re going to get a spritz of acid followed by a wobbly afternoon does not engender a restful night.

I’m writing this at the end of my eighth week doing HA. It seems to be working a little but not fully. It can take a while to really settle in, apparently, so I go back now for monthly “maintenance” sessions. I’m hopeful that, in the end, three minutes of discomfort to dislodge months of misery will be a bargain worth taking.

In the meantime, I’ll do my best to gag any layer of complaining.

I first wrote about my acid experience for The Jerusalem Post.

GAG layer image and Ialuril from the ProPharma website.

{ 0 comments }

Why does so much of the liberal West seem to despise Zionism? Why has the term, which simply means the belief that Jews have a right to have a state of their own, become such a pejorative in progressive circles and some right-wing ones, too?

Alana Newhouse, editor-in-chief of Tablet, says it’s envy – not of the Jews, per se, but of the nation-state of Israel.


In a 6,000-word tour de force,Zionism for Everyone,” Newhouse claims that a rudderless, identity-emaciated Western world sees the success of the Zionist nation-state and wants its societies to be more like Israel. But since those Westerners can’t articulate such longing out loud (and probably not to themselves, either), as so often happens with jealousy,  Zionism has been twisted into a placeholder for all the evils of the world.

I know: To say that the world envies the Jews risks playing into age-old tropes of antisemitism – the Jews are smart and powerful; we control everything, including the U.S. administration. Newhouse is aware of that, but her critique starts from a different place, thousands of years in the past, before there were even Jews.

As soon as human beings developed agriculture and began to settle into non-nomadic groups, the nation-state became the best way to defend against outsiders and, more importantly, to define a sense of belonging amongst individuals who might not have that much in common.

In that sense, a nation-state may be best described as a country or place “where political borders align with a shared sense of peoplehood, comprising identity, culture, language or history.”

The nation-state has since become the defining structure for human society, through kingdoms and empires to the modern era, always providing a key tool for cohesion and coherence.

Then came the Holocaust, which, Newhouse claims, destabilized the existing order.

“As the rebuilding efforts began, alongside them came an ideological and philosophical reckoning,” Newhouse quotes Swedish writer Annika Hernroth-Rothstein. Rather than accepting “that seemingly normal people under extraordinary circumstances can do terrible things, [instead] Europe decided that the villain was ideology itself.”

As a result, “thinkers such as Hannah Arendt, Jean-Paul Sartre [and] Albert Einstein” began to describe the nation state as a key cause for this moral and political danger and began “advocating for global humanism,” Newhouse writes. “And so, a war-damaged continent, having just come out of a global conflict over borders and identity, decided to do away with borders and identity altogether, assuming this would be the road to lasting peace.”

Gradually, Western societies lost confidence in their own particularism. Here’s where Zionism comes in: It has, against all odds, created a successful and lasting nation-state, one which is not disintegrating into post-modernist confusion.

As the West gives up the “privileges of self-determination,” Newhouse writes, it becomes “possible to imagine that Israel is somehow getting away with what no one else can.”

There are four main pillars to why Newhouse calls Israel “a blueprint for human defense and flourishing.”

  1. Israel maintains demographic continuity. Our child replacement rates are way above OECD countries and Israel’s citizens still want to build a future here.
  2. Israel has a strong sense of collective responsibility. When called to defend the country, nearly everyone shows up; our soldiers may not like doing hundreds of days of reserve duty, but they still come.
  3. Israel preserves identity and community. When they’re given a weekend at home, Israeli soldiers gladly gather together on Friday nights with family or friends.
  4. Israel has produced a cohesive, capable population that looks to the future. We don’t pine for an imaginary past. There’s a reason there are so many game-changing startups in this small nation.

So, when the post-modern West looks at Israel, the nation-state, they see an outlier they subconsciously aspire to. Zionism has become “a target because it represents what Westerners on the Right claim to desperately want but are unable to attain, and what Westerners on the Left wish to define as impossible,” she writes.

But in the midst of a confusing and fast-changing world, with high-tech innovations fueling cultural and political instability, the world is at a pivot point. Yet, instead of grappling with those complex challenges, the public fixates on Israel and Zionism because they’re a simpler target: In the public’s warped thinking, there’s a clear villain and a clean moral narrative people can rally around.

Zionism has become the symbol onto which people project all their frustrations about their rapidly changing lived reality. Anti-Zionism gets bundled with anti-capitalism, anti-imperialism and anti-Americanism. It’s not about the Jews, Newhouse stresses. Israel has become a test case for delegitimizing the entire concept of national identity, which so many believe has failed them.

Newhouse largely downplays antisemitism as the primary driver for hostility to Zionism. She doesn’t deny that it exists, just that blaming anti-Zionism primarily on antisemitism misdiagnoses the phenomenon. The main cause, in her view, is structural, not prejudice.

The Zionism = antisemitism argument is based on the idea that hatred of Jews has shifted from religion and race to the nation-state of Israel. For Newhouse, Zionism has become a target because of what it represents, not because Jews are Jews. Attacks on Zionism are based on projection – blaming others for what’s being lost – and, again, envy: resentment of the non-functioning national models in their own countries.

So, when students on campuses chant slogans like “from the river to the sea,” it’s not about antisemitism; it’s about the West struggling with itself.

Newhouse’s analysis doesn’t include any practical steps for fighting anti-Zionism; it’s more a philosophical thought piece that contextualizes this fraught moment in Zionism as “a technology for national renewal that could, conceivably, be used by anyone.” In that respect, it has helped me better see why it’s worth living in Israel, especially when missiles fly and sirens wail.

I first wrote about Alana Newhouse’s article for The Jerusalem Post.

{ 0 comments }

Rewriting the “Pharaoh Constant”: A sci-fi re-imagining of the Exodus

April 5, 2026

What if the Exodus had never happened? A future “visitor” returns to the past to insert his consciousness into Moses to ensure the Exodus occurs.

Read the full article →

The Iran war is about China, not Israel

March 22, 2026

Every significant American foreign policy decision, from the pivot to Asia to the tariff wars…is ultimately about countering Chinese hegemony

Read the full article →

Missiles. Trump. Halacha

March 7, 2026

There was something surreal in Israel’s bomb shelters this past Shabbat. Many Sabbath-observant residents had their phones in their hands.

Read the full article →

What does Zionism mean to me?

February 21, 2026

When people I’d interview overseas would ask me what brought me to the Holy Land. My usual answer: “Zionism.” Now I’m not sure how to respond.

Read the full article →

The reality slap

February 7, 2026

Dr. Russ Harris was looking forward to welcoming his first child. But it wasn’t long after his son was born that he realized something wasn’t right

Read the full article →